Tag Archives: NEX-7

Fujifilm X-Pro 2, Alleged To Be Announced In A Few Weeks, Does Not Make Any Sense.

Anura Guruge December 2014 thumbnail
.

.

.
.
.
by Anura Guruge


Related posts:
>> ‘Lunar Mirrorless’
is NOT an Hasselblad. 
>>
My analysis of ‘Camera Labs’ point-and-shoot.
>>
Death knell for Lytro Illum.
>> Panasonic’s
new REFOCUS.


>>
Bought Sony RX100 II.
>> Bought Panasonic Lumix FZ1000.

++++ Search ‘camera’ for other posts >>>>

++++ Check Category ‘Six Images’ >>>>


Click here to access original article.

fujipro2

Click to ENLARGE and read here.


 

Yes, now that I have CONVINCED myself that my next BIG camera (not counting a ‘GoPro’ equivalent I just bought because the girls want one for Christmas) will the supposed Fuji X-T2 I am, of course, doing my diligence on Fuji and their cameras.

I have done some, though not extensive, research on the X-T1 vs. X-Pro 1. From everything I can see the X-Pro 1 is now a folly. The X-T1 is superior to it in every way other than for the fact that it does NOT look like an old rangefinder and does not have an Optical Viewfinder (OVF). Got that. I have to believe that Fuji no longer sells many X-Pro 1s. That is fine and fair. Most people who want a Fuji X-family camera are probably opting, despite the higher price, for the X-T1.

To bring out a X-Pro 2, especially without 4K video (though that bothers me naught), does not make sense. From my research the ONLY meaningful improvement that the X-Pro 2 will have over the X-Pro 1 is higher resolution — at least 24MP vs. the current 16MP. Yes, of course, that is never to be sneezed at. 16MP is on the low side and 24MP, in 2016, is ‘Goldilocks’.

But the PRIME APPEAL of the X-Pro is its retro look. My contention is that those that like the retro look probably already think that 16MP is way beyond what they need. Lets face it you can take some pretty fine images with 16MP.

The reason I am waiting for the X-T2 is the higher resolution. But as we already discussed the X-T1 is a better camera, technically and in practice, that the X-Pro 1. So a X-T2 makes a lot of sense. Not so a X-Pro 2.

Just like the rather stupid a68 Sony announced last month. Marginal cameras searching for a niche. These Japanese camera manufacturers, Canon, Nikon, Sony, Fuji, as I broached upon yesterday, really are in need of some ADULT supervision. Just remember camera companies can go UNDER. Kodak. Polaroid.


Digital Camera Makers Canon, Nikon, Sony et. al. Are ALL LOSING Money!

Anura Guruge December 2014 thumbnail
.

.

.
.
.
by Anura Guruge


Related posts:
>> ‘Lunar Mirrorless’
is NOT an Hasselblad. 
>>
My analysis of ‘Camera Labs’ point-and-shoot.
>>
Death knell for Lytro Illum.
>> Panasonic’s
new REFOCUS.

>> Bought Sony RX100 II.
>> Bought Panasonic Lumix FZ1000.

++++ Search ‘camera’ for other posts >>>>

++++ Check Category ‘Six Images’ >>>>


Click on images to access original articles.

canonloses112212

** ** ** ** ** **

nikonlosesesdadda

** ** ** ** ** **

sonylosesssaasa


Watching the gay abandon with which these Japanese companies roll out extremely marginal digital camera offerings — e.g., Canon Rebel T6i vs T6s — you would NOT realize that they are ALL bleeding money like crazy.

Yes, there is HUGE undisciplined and unrestrained mismanagement. Canon, Nikon and Sony could save MILLIONS of dollars a year IF they would just rationalize their digital camera offerings and concentrate on just providing a few ‘best in class’ products rather than hundreds of hard to differentiate models.

Lets us NOT forget Kodak and Polaroid.

Both of these U.S. companies were iconic pioneering GIANTS. They are basically GONE!

So cameras companies can stumble, badly, and end up in death spirals.

With smartphone cameras eating into digital camera sales on a daily basis I expect a MAJOR shakedown and consolidation of the digital camera market over the next 18 months.

IT HAS TO HAPPEN.

These companies have to play smarter. The current situation is untenable.


Calling The ‘Lunar Mirrorless’ An Hasselblad Is A CRIME!

Anura Guruge December 2014 thumbnail
.

.

.
.
.
by Anura Guruge


Related posts:
>>
My analysis of ‘Camera Labs’ point-and-shoot.
>>
Death knell for Lytro Illum.
>> Panasonic’s
new REFOCUS.

>> Bought Sony RX100 II.
>> Bought Panasonic Lumix FZ1000.
>> 6 Images for the Day.
>> Taking Selfies My Way III.

++++ Search ‘camera’ for other posts >>>>

++++ Check Category ‘Six Images’ >>>>


hasselbard12121a

Click for ‘B&H’ listing.


sonynex7723424

Click for the Amazon listing for the Sony NEX-7.


Talk about a let down. I saw the ‘B&H’ ad. for an Hasselblad on Facebook. When I saw the price I did get EXCITED. I have always lusted after an Hasselblad! At $1,299 I could seriously afford it — though Deanna would brain me (though she is convinced that I will buy myself another camera (my 3rd in the last few months) before Christmas).

Given that I do NOT keep up with Hasselblads I checked. I was CRUSHED. It is a re-branded Sony NEX-7 and the DEAD GIVEAWAY is that it uses Sony E-mount lenses. It has a different facade — BUT it is NOT manufactured by Hasselblad in Sweden. Instead it is made by Sony in Thailand. Screw that for a game of soldiers. To be fair I have toyed at the idea of getting a NEX.

They are NOT the only ones doing this unbecoming rebranding trick. The Leica VLux is the very same camera as my Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 (with a longer warranty)!

But I am going to wait. Right now my goal is to wait for the Fuji X-T2. We, and by that I do mean us as a family, most likely will get a GoPro for Christmas. I own GoPro stock. So it seems the right thing to do. Devanee would like one.