Some of the ‘Blind Test’ comparison pictures.
Click to ENLARGE.
Doesn’t matter which one is better. They are pretty close.
The DAMN Sony lens is 2.2 MORE EXPENSIVE.
I can pay 2.2 less and have the same image quality!
The test is in Japanese BUT, luckily, Google does an excellent job translating.
I did NOT have to do the whole test.
By the time I looked at 4 pictures I knew that my CONTENTION re. Sony was proved — BIG TIME.
My only gripe about Sony has been the prices of their lenses — especially full-frame, FE-mount lenses. They are ridiculously expensive. Yes, I could afford them BUT I would have a hard time justifying their prices. That is the reason I want to go with Nikon.
Until now, I couldn’t because Nikon didn’t make mirrorless, and I committed myself to mirrorless over 3-years ago.
The Nikon z6 is thus the ideal camera for I. Full-frame mirrorless, 5-axis In-Body Image Stabilization and affordable lenses (though I am not that convinced that the new lenses are superlative).
So, here is the CRUX of the Blind Test.
By definition, a Blind Test, compares similar offerings.
So, the image quality Nikon vs Sony was going to be CLOSE. And it is.
But, here is the kicker. The lens on the Sony is 2.2 MORE EXPENSIVE than that of the Nikon.
2.2 MORE Expensive and you can’t tell the DIFFERENCE.
Give me a break. I will have the CHEAP Nikon PLEASE.